Full article PDF (language ukrainian)

UDC 130.2:330.163.14

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2017.1.16

 I. I. Parkhomenko, PhD candidate in philosophy

Philosophical Faculty, Department of Ethics, Aesthetics and Cultural Studies

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

60, Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine





 Current European integration course in Ukraine requires rethinking Ukrainian scientific and policies meaning of the cultural sphere as the set of cultural industries, which produce and distribute goods or services with special cultural value, irrespective of the commercial value they may have. According to the main UN Resolutions, UNESCO Conventions and legal activity of the European Commission since 90th of XX century cultural assets are considered to be - an instrument and resource of economic, cultural and social sustainable development of states, cities and regions. New conditions require scientific methods for modelling Ukrainian cultural industries, identification of the priority industries. Besides the concept of cultural industries European scientists and governmental officials, use the concept of creative industries, especially, for the policymaking. All that show the need for clarification of these concepts in Ukrainian scientific field and policies making practice for governmental purposes. The purpose of this article is to study the meaning of the concepts of cultural and creative industries according to the European scientific discourse and policies making documents in the EU and the UK. The article shows that modern European scientists do not use the tradition of critical interpretation of the cultural industry, which was offered by representatives of the Frankfurt School in the mid-twentieth century. Scientists improve concepts to identify the sphere of culture as an economic reality, which is reflected in the specific governmental documents of the UK, the EU and UNESCO for policies making to improve sustainable development. The models of cultural and creative industries offer a logic of distinction according to the basis of the value component: the output of the creative activity has utility that is more functional for the consumers; it could be a component of the production of other industries, not only cultural industries. Cultural output has cultural value. The purpose of the creative industries is to produce goods and services for the commercial trade. Cultural industries produce cultural content, which embodies or conveys cultural expressions.

 Keywords: cultural and creative industries, EU, cultural goods and services, cultural economy, cultural diversity and expressions


1. Adorno, T.; Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Moscow, Medium (In Russian).

2. Benjamin, W. (1996) The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Moscow, Medium (In Russian).

3. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005). Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001429/142919r.pdf.

4. Babe, R. E. (2009) Cultural Studies and Political Economy: Toward a New Integration. USA, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

5. Creative Industries Mapping Document (2001). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mappingdocuments-2001

6. Frey Bruno, S. (2003) Art: the Economic Point of View. Arts and Economics, 19–34.

7. Garnham, N. (1995) Political Economy and Cultural Studies: Reconciliation or Divorse? Journal Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12, 60–71.

8. GREEN PAPER. Unlocking the Potential of Cultural and Creative Industries (2010). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0183

9. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2008) Cultural and Creative Industries. In The SAGE Handbook of cultural analysis. Bennett T., Flow J. London, SAGE Publications.

10. Roodhouse, S. (2006) The Creative Industries: Definitions, Quantification and Practice. In Cultural Industries. The British Experience in International Perspective. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13–33.

11. Sommerville, J. C. (1996) The News Revolution in England: cultural dynamics of daily information. New York, Oxford University Press.

12. Throsby, D. (2008) The concentric circles model of the cultural industries. Cultural Trends, 17(3), 147–164.

13. Williams, R. (1960) Culture and Society 1780‒1950. New York.

Corresponding author: Iryna Parkhomenko

Copyright © 201Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv University Publishing