Full text - PDF

UDC 177.61

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2018.1(2).12

V. E. Turenko, PhD, Junior Research Fellow

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 

60, Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine 

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 


 The article analyzes the nature of the romantic culture of love. Romantic love is seen as a love culture, which includes a set of beliefs, ideals, principles that have developed in the Middle Ages, and the idea of which passes from generation to generation, from one century to another. It is emphasized that the romantic culture of love is not only a discourse of passion and ethos of eros. This cultural-historical type of love absorbs the connotations agape, filia and storge. Consequently, the discourse of those who love in the romantic invariant is not focused solely on passion, it is also caring, understanding, responsibility, attention, sacrifice, etc. – aspects inherent in love-filia, love-storge and love-agape. It is proved that a discourse of romantic culture of love is not realized through the prism of "rose-colored glasses", but in the context of understanding that the emergence of this feeling inevitably generates a sense of vulnerability in both participants of the love discourse. The presence of sorrow in one of the participants of the discourse of love is one of the most characteristic and vivid signs of the romantic culture of love. From the philosophical point of view, various aspects of love affliction are considered as markers of truth and authenticity of feelings, relationships between lovers. Tears, in romantic love - is not the weakness of an object and/or subject of love discourse, but it is their strength, depth and basis for the continuation of their history of feelings. It turns out that in contrast to the modern post-romantic culture of love, in the romantic tradition, the basis of love relations is the maximum recognition of the person. The one who we love is given to us as a fact of life, as the world itself. Love for which the only truly significant and determining any choice is the value of a particular, separate personality. The person we love, in essence, cannot be the subject of evaluation. One may be neither reasonable, nor good, but he/she is capable of transforming a valuable world, revealing its unity, its ability to harmony and doomed to disharmony. The love of human to human (the subject of Love) is the path where all the faces and all the boundaries, that distinguish people from one or another affiliation, disappear.

Key words: romantic love culture, love culture, human life, human love, courtly culture of love, philosophy of love. 


1. Apresyan, R. G. (2005). Ideal romanticheskoy lyubvi v postromanticheskuyu epohu [The ideal of romantic love in the post-romantic epoch]. Ethical Thought, 6, 201‒219.

2. Johnson, R. (1998). We: Understanding the Psychology of Romantic Love. Moskow, Gil-estel (in Russian).

3. Zubets, O.P. (1989). Lyubov v zerkale morali. In Razmyishleniya o lyubvi [Love in the mirror of morality. In Reflections on love]. Мoskow, Znanie.

4. Ortega-i-Gasset, H. (1991). Studies on love. In Aesthetics. Philosophy of culture. Мoskow, Iskusstvo (in Russian).

5. Fisher, H. (2013). Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. Moskow, Alpina non-fikshn (in Russian). 

 © V. E. Turenko 2018