Back to issue

Full text - PDF

UDC 177.61

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2019.1(4).07

V. E. Turenko, Ph.D.,

junior research fellow Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

60, Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine

 

POLEMICNESS AND AGONALITY OF DISCOURSE OF LOVE: PHILOSOPHICAL AND CULTURAL VIEW

The article conceptualizes the idea of the unity of love and war based on the mythological, cultural, and philosophical aspects. The author, based on a number of theoretical and empirical arguments, hypothesizes that the "polemical" (warlike) Eros`s image as archer with arrows has its roots in Middle Eastern (Sumerian-Akkadian, Semitic) mythology, which saw not the opposition of love and war, and a close relationship of these phenomenons in the image of Ishtar (Inanna, Astarte). It is highlighted that the courtly culture of love through the idea of winning lady's heart is characterized by the fact that it is the cultural, empirical embodiment of the understanding of the unity of the discourse of love and the discourse of war. It emphazises the idea that the philosophical aspect of understanding this issue is associated with two phenomenons, namely power and gift. Accordingly, it is within the frame- work of the discourse of love that the “admiration” takes place, the effect of which is explained by the fact that having subjugated the object of love, the subject himself obeys him. At the same time, in the context of the gift, there is an “agon”, that is, a competition between those in love regarding the exchange of gifts and pleasures. Therefore, it is argued that the discourse of love is polemical and agonal.

Key words: love, love discourse, war, battle, admiration, courtly love, gift, polemicness, agonality, Eros.

 

REFERENCES

1. Afanas'yeva, V. K., D'yakonov I. M. (1991). Ishtar. Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya v dvukh tomakh, V. 1. [Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia in two volumes, V. 1.]. Moskow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya.

2. Bart, R. (2006). A Lover's Discourse: Fragments. L`viv: Nezalezhny`j kul`turologichny`j zhurnal "I" (In Ukrainian ).

3. Braginskaya, N. V. (2011). Otkuda u Erota kryl'ya? [Where did Eroth's wings come from?]. Nymphon antron. Sbornik statey v chest' Azy Alibekovny Takho-Godi. Voprosy klassicheskoj filologii. Moskow, Nikeya, 53–94.

4. Dyubi, Zh. (1990). Kurtuaznaya lyubov' i peremeny v polozhenii zhenshchin vo Frantsii XII v. [Courtly love and changes in the status of women in France in the 12th century.]. In Odissey. Chelovek v istorii [Odys- seus. Man in history], pp. 90‒96. Moskow, Nauka.

5. Ivanova-Kazas, O. M. (1994). Mifologicheskaya zoologiya [Mytho- logical Zoology]. Sankt-Peterburg, Filologicheskiy f-t SPbGU.

6. Malakhov, V. A. (2006). Poglyad na lyubov [A look at love]. In Ety`ka spilkuvannya: Navch. posibny`k [Ethics of communication: Textbook],
pp. 362–369. Kyiv, Ly`bid`.

7. Ruzhmon, D. de (2004). Iskusstvo lyubit' i iskusstvo voyevat' [The art of love and the art of war]. In Kollezh sotsiologii [College of Sociology],
pp. 267‒290. Sankt-Peterburg, Nauka.

8. Yarovoy, A. V. (2017). Ot kul'tury voyny k voyne kul'tur: sotsio- kul'turnyye proyektsii agonal'nosti v yevropeyskoy i yevraziyskoy kul'turakh [From the culture of war to the war of cultures: sociocultural projections of agonalism in European and Eurasian culture]. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media.

9. Black, J., Green, A. (1992). Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia. An Illustrated Dictionary. Austin and London, University of Texas Press.

10. Chroust, A.-H. (1980). The Influence of Zoroastrian Teachings on Plato, Aristotle, and Greek Philosophy in General. New scholasticism, Vol. 54, No3, 342‒357.

11. Digby, T. (2014). Love and War: How Militarism Shapes Sexuality and Romance. New York, Columbia University Press.

12. Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae (1986). Zürich und München: Artemis Verlag, III.1, Atherion ‒ Eros.

© V. E. Turenko, 2019