Back to issue

Full text - PDF

UDC 159.9:629.735 (043.2)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2019.2(5).14

F. P. Vlasenko, Ph.D., Associate Professor,

Ye. V. Levcheniuk, Ph.D., Associate Professor

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,

60, Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine

INFORMATION CULTURE AND CYBERCULTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT

Goal. To carry out socio-philosophical conceptualization of the phenomenon of information culture and cyberculture as the newest factors that determine the development of modern society and is characterized by intensification of processes of informatization and technologization. Theoret- ical basis. The authors have proved that the concepts of information culture and cyberculture are united in the sense of theoretical generalizations about understanding the essence of modern society (mass, virtual, global, information) and so on. It is substantiated that the main condition and consequence of the development of modern society is the emergence of information culture and cyberculture, which serve as the unity of value models of technical, information and technological levels of civilization, which simultaneously forms a new type of person, which is realized in two dimensions – real (physical, social) and virtual. Scientific novelty. It is substantiated that modern society is in a state of radical large-scale, systemic transformations, the consequence of which is a new stage of development of the relation "man – world", "man – society", "man – man". According to the authors, the determining factor is the development of information culture and cyberculture, which characterize the latest achievements in the development of modern science, technology, education. Conclusions. Progressive achievements of the technosphere of the late 20-th – early 21-st century created new conditions for the development of the society and a man. These advances have both complicated and simplified social connections and rela- tionships. This is how e-economy, e-education, e-government, e-tourism, and others have come into being and evolve. At the same time, culture is gaining a new dimension of development. It is transferred to the sphere of the Internet, network communities and is characterized as an information culture, cyberculture, forming a qualitatively new outlook with relevant values, norms, social roles and behaviors of modern man.

Keywords: culture, information culture, cyberculture, society, modern society.

REFERENCES:

1. Baudrillard, J. (2001). The System of Objects, Moskow, Rudomino (In Russian).

2. Voronkova, V. G. (2014). Formuvannia informatsiinoi kul`tury osobystosti iak umova uspishnoi adaptatsii liudyny do zhyttia v informatsi- inomu suspil`stvi. [Formation of personal information culture as a condition for successful adaptation of a person to life in the information society]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk. Filosofs`ki nauky, Vyp. 86, 198–203.

3. Dery, M. (2008). Escape Velocity: Cyberculture at the End of the Century. Ekaterinburh, Ul`traKultura; Moskow, AST MOSKVA. Retrieved from http:marsexx.ru/lit/deryescape.html (In Russian).

4. Desiaterik, D. (2004). Virtual`na real`nist [Virtual Reality]. Retrieved from http://www.day.kiev.ua/uk/article/cuspilstvo/virtualna-realnist

5. Ivanov, D. V. (2002). Vyrtualyzatsyia obshchestva [Society virtual- ization]. SPb., Peterburhskoe Vostokovedenie.

6. Ivanov, M.S. (2008). Psikholohyia samorealizatsii lichnosti v komp`iuternoi ihrovoi deiatel`nosty [Psychology of personal self-realization in computer gaming]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat.

7. Kirillova, N. B. (2006). Medyakul`tura: ot moderna k postmodernu: monohrafiia [Media Culture: From Modern to Postmodern]. Moskow, Akademicheskii Proekt.

8. Korabl`ova, V. M. (2014). Sotsial`ni smisli ideologii: monohrafiia [Social meanings of ideology]. Kyiv, VADEKS.

9. Kurilenko, I. A. (2018). Postkul`tura / mediakul`tura / kiberkul`tura / transkul`tura / protokul`tura: aspekti terminolohichnoi semantiki [Postculture / Media / Cyberculture / Transculture / Protoculture: Aspects of Terminological Semantics]. Kul`turologiia, 60, 68–76.

10. Kutyrev, V. (2012). Vremia Mortido [Time of Mortido]. S-Pb., Aleteia.

11. Militarev, V. Iu. (1990). Informatsionnaia kul`tura epokhi NTR. In- formatika i kul`tura [Information culture of the era of scientific research]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, Sibirskoe otdelenie, 94–108.

12. Negodaev, I. A. (2004). Informatizatsiia kul`tury [Informatization of culture]. Obshchestvennye nauki. No 3, 106–112.

13. Nosov, N. A. (2000). Virtual`naia psikhologiia [Virtual psychology]. Moskow, Arhraf.

14. OrtegayGasset, Kh. (1994). The Revolt of the Masses. Kyiv, Osnovi (In Ukrainian).

15. Petlin, M. A. (2013). Postmodernaia kul`tura – kiberkul`tura [Post- modern Culture – Cyber Culture]. Omskii nauchnyi vestnik, No 5 (122), 121–124.

16. Rams`kyii, Yu. S. (2004). Formuvannia informatsiinoi kul`tury osobi – prioritetne zavdannia suchasnoi osvitn`oi diial`nosti. Komp`iuterno- oriientovani sistemi navchannia [Formation of information culture of a per- son is a priority task of modern educational activity]. Kyiv, NPU im. M. P. Dragomanova. 8, 19‒42.

17. Skvortsov, L. V. (2001). Informatsionnaia kul`tura y tsel`noe znanie: izbrannye trudy [Information Culture and Integral Knowledge: Se- lected Works]. Moskow.

18. Solov`ev, A. V. (2009). Dinamika kul`tury informatsionnoi epokhi: monografiia [The dynamics of the culture of the information age]. Riazan, Riaz. gos. un-t im. S. A. Esenina.

19. Uebster, F. (2004). Teorii informatsionnogo obshchestva [Infor- mation Society Theories]. Moskow, Aspekt Press.

20. Shreider, Yu. A. (1988). Problemy razvitiia infosredy i intellekt spetsialista [Problems of development of information environment and intel- ligence of a specialist]. In Intellektual`naia kul`tura spetsialista, 110‒136. Novosibirsk, Nauka.

21. Masuda, Y. The (1983). Information Society as Postindustrial Soci- ety. Wash., WorldFuture Soc.

© F. P. Vlasenko, Ye. V. Levcheniuk 2019