I. I. Maslikova, PhD, Associate Professor
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,
60, Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine
POLYFUNCTIONALITY AND CULTURAL VALUE OF PUBLIC SPACE: HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL STUDY OF AN URBAN SQUARE
The article explores changes in the organization and functioning of public space in cities in the context of sociocultural dynamics – from antiq- uity to modernшен. The sociocultural features of open urban space in ancient Greece and Rome, Renaissance Italy, modern Europe, the USA, Latin America, Ukraine are clarified. The experience of the functioning and management of public space is analyzed on specific examples of world- famous urban squares – Antique agora, roman forum, piazza del Campo in Siena, piazza della Signoria in Florence, piazza San Marco in Venice, Union Square in New York, Latin American squares, Bibikovsky boulevard and University park in old Kyiv, "Maydan" – Independence Square in contemporary Kyiv. Particular attention is being given to transformations of ceremonial, religious, recreational, economic, political, aesthetic and moral functions of open public space. Urban squares are places for official celebrations and religious rituals. They serves as a place of a rest, reali- zation of creative ideas and are a conductor of public communication. Public spaces create opportunities for trade, affect the formation and reten- tion of real estate prices, and are a means of attracting investment and business development in them and adjacent territories. All these provide opportunities for uniting citizens for joint projects and activities, political protests or symbolization of power. It is noted that the cultural value of the modern square is manifested in architectural forms, aesthetics of recreational areas and historical monuments, and is associated with its ability to be a place for the proclamation and implementation of high moral ideals of order, equality, solidarity, freedom, independence, human dignity, the value of moral rights and civic virtues. From the time of antiquity to the present day, the central squares of cities, as a public space, reproduce the aesthetics of the city and become a symbol of spiritual and political power, since temples, municipalities, financial and commercial institutions, theaters, and restaurants are often concentrated in such spaces.
Key words: public space, urban square, cultural value, city architecture, moral ideals.
1. Vitruvij, (2003). Desyat` knig ob arkhitekture [Ten books about ar- chitecture]. Moskow, Editoryal URSS.
2. Delumeau, J. (2006). Czivilizacziya Vozrozhdeniya [Renaissance Civilization]. Ekaterinburh, U-Faktoria.
3. Zukin, Sh. (2019). Obnazhenny`j gorod. Smert` I zhizn` auten- tichny`kh gorodskikh prostranstv [Naked city. The death and life of authentic urban spaces]. Moskow, Izdatel`stvo Instituta Gajdara.
4. Kol`, Dzh. (2000). Arkhitektura Pozdnego Renessansa v Veneczii i Veneto [Architecture of the Late Renaissance in Venice and Veneto]. In Iskusstvo ital`yanskogo Renessansa. Arkhitektura. Skul`ptura. Zhivopis`. Risunok, 156‒174. Köln, Könemann.
5. Kule, K. (2004). SMI v Drevnej Greczii. Sochineniya, rechi, ra- zy`skaniya, puteshestviya [Media in ancient Greece. Works, speeches, search, travel]. Moskow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
6. Low, S. M. (2016). Plasa: politika obshhestvennogo prostranstva i kul`tury` [Plaza: politics of public space and culture]. Moskow, Strelka Press.
7. Majdan Nezalezhnosti`. Zvi`d pam'yatok i`stori`yi ta kul`turi [Inde- pendence Square]. Retrieved from http://pamyatky.kiev.ua/streets/maydan- nezalezhnosti.
8. Makarov, A. (2017). Blagoustrojstvo starogo Kieva [Improvement of old Kiev]. Kyiv, SkyHorse.
9. MakLin, A. (2000). Arkhitektura Renessansa vo Florenczii i Czentral`noj Italii [Renaissance Architecture in Florence and Central Italy]. In Iskusstvo ital`yanskogo Renessansa. Arkhitektura. Skul`ptura. Zhivopis`. Risunok. Köln, Könemann, 98‒128.
10. MakLin, A. (2000). Ital`yanskaya arkhitektura Pozdnego Srednevekov`ya [Italian architecture of the late Middle Ages]. In Iskusstvo ital`yanskogo Renessansa. Arkhitektura. Skul`ptura. Zhivopis`. Risunok. Köln, Könemann, 12‒35.
11. Chaunu, P. (2008). Czivilizacziya Prosveshheniya [Civilization of Enlightenment]. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya.
12. Choisy, A. (2008). Vseobshhaya istoriya arkhitektury` [General His- tory of Architecture]. Moskow, E`ksmo.
13. Peter, G. M. (1968). Public squares: an analysis of an urban space form and its functional determinants. Vancouver, University of British Co- lumbia.
14. Smith, N., Low, S. (2006). Introduction: The Imperative of Public Space. The politics of public space. New York, Routledge Taylor& Francis Group, 1‒16.
15. Wilson, J. Q., Kelling, G. L. (1998). Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety. From Criminal Justice System: Politics and Poli- cies. Seventh Edition. Belmont, Wadsworth Publishing, 103‒115.
© I. I. Maslikova 2019